new findings children seriously coronavirus

New findings children seriously coronavirus how to#

Figure that out and we will be much closer to a vaccine. The reason small children do not get this as badly as adults-this is the clue. I'm a big girl and can read articles and take from them what I choose. LisaSummit2 said:I have read NO ARTICLE AND BEEN MISINFORMED. When this is all said and done, I see the death rate at more like 20% of those infected.

It will probably mutate and become more and more deadly and strong. The virus will kill THOUSANDS in poverty stricken places like Africa. And to make you think I'm even more stupid-this 3-4% death rate is WAY TOO LOW. They're young, strong and easily impressionable compared to adults If this is what this virus is-I'm guarantying you they have thousands of vaccines ready and waiting to end this pandemic. Children are impressionable and would be easier to force into communism or whatever it may be. Maybe a group wants all old people and middle agers to be cut down population wise. Look, I'm just saying OPEN MINDS solve problems-going on old information is reinventing the wheel. So maybe terrorists don't WANT any light shed on them until they finish what they're up to. There are several books claiming this was the first act of terrorism and most of the families never bought the static in center fuel tank neat and tidy story. As far as terrorists love to claim their catastrophic deeds.my brother, his wife and 2 cousins died in the major TWA flight in 96. I have read NO ARTICLE AND BEEN MISINFORMED.

11 (sometimes) deadly diseases that hopped across species.

In comparison, people who were tested only after developing symptoms were isolated 4.6 days after the symptoms emerged, an additional 1.9 days of potentially transmitting the virus. People who were tested proactively because of their contact with an infected person were isolated 2.7 days after developing symptoms, the researchers found. And we don't know the best time to close schools or how long they need to stay closed to reduce the spread of the disease.Ī second lesson described in the new research is that close surveillance can help to stop the new coronavirus from spreading. School closure is a difficult decision, epidemiologists previously told Live Science, because it is a highly disruptive step. If children are effective at transmitting the virus, it would bolster the case for school closures aimed at reducing the scope of the outbreak. 'I have a 7-month-old and a 6-year-old, and I can't imagine that, if they have any virus at all, they're not getting it on somebody.'

New findings children seriously coronavirus how to#

'That's one of the current critical remaining questions, and we're trying to figure out how to answer' it, study co-author Justin Lessler, an infectious-disease epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told Nature News.

This is likely because children have healthier lungs than adults do (they don't smoke and have fewer years of exposure to pollution) and because adults are more likely to have dangerous immune responses to respiratory diseases, experts told Live Science last month. The study is not yet peer-reviewed, but it did reproduce a pattern that researchers have been observing since early in the outbreak: Children don't seem to get sick with COVID-19, the disease caused by the virus, at the same rate adults do. This surveillance of close contacts allowed the researchers to understand how the disease spread through friends, colleagues and family members. 14, as well as 1,286 of their close contacts. The research team, led by scientists from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, followed 391 people who contracted the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, between Jan. Those are the results of a new study from China's Shenzhen province uploaded on the preprint site MedRxiv on March 4.